Focusing on Sin inverse Moral Ethical Reaction & Response
I think that inherently within the socio-political construct of humanity there exists a desire for “order ” – where emotionally it is expressed a combination of “joy”, “happiness”, or “love.”
Order, Joy, Happiness, and Peace is a Universal Desire, but the means and methods of achieving it differ…
Whether Liberal or Conservative many may regard them as two-sides of an America, USA – which refuses to be divided. The political ploys to pit the left from the right – is the fight! This is our home, compromise is necessary; but there are consequences to our choices as a society.
For many conservatives and liberals the divide is palpable. The tangible nature of the cognitive dissonance between Right & Left is immature, counterintuitive, and rudimentary within a “reactionary” juxtaposed “responsive.” Simply, “reactive” is a knee-jerk response instigated by physical reflexes not instigating the mind. “Responsive,” an assertive approach…
In sum, I am suggesting a responsive approach where being patient and allowing the status quo to find center is a supernal law guiding the “sopcio-political” structure most conducive to “divine” purpose.
Metaphorically, a hive of bees organized in a well structured colony that produces “honey,” appealing to God. Civic Duty within the framework of the US Bureaucratic Republic was a country heavily influenced by the “voice” of its citizens. It would be safe to assume that there exists a breakdown in Civic dynamics relative to a juxtaposition of “voice” and “money,’ where with money your “voice” goes up a thousand decibels…
I digress.
I see societal norms in a state of flux relative to a perceived norm within a juxtaposition of “mass media,” or “popular” opinion and a spectrum of socio-political voices within America where there is a growing conservative movement, where “conservative,” is now in the middle relative to the status-quo as it is applies morally & ethically.
Root:
I suggest that socially and politically there was an over emphasis on religious rigidity. Socially and Politically it reflected a “conservative,” paradigm.
The reflection we see in society directly correlates to the nuclear family unit. In sum: Society is not angry with “Religion,” or the “Conservative-Right” as a movement, We are dealing with individual relationship- breakdowns between a parent who was the aforementioned conservative…
Focusing on sin can be a heavy burden. By making sin the focal point of relationship between humanity and divinity; there is an inherent negative connotation within the framework of dogmatic propagation.
If you were to view sin as the sweat, pain, tears, and dedication to work out your spiritual body where repentance strengthens and empowers you, would offer a more productive view of “sin.”
Relative to doctrinal belief within LDS theology, Christ’s Atonement inherently relative to “potential,” created an “upper” and “lower” bound. Rock-bottom is an individual road, but you can never fall deep enough to go beyond the extended arms of God, even The Lord, Jesus Christ. Not only will he catch us – he can lift us; with potential beyond our wildest dreams.
Practicality of Moral Declination:
The burden of sin can induce moral decline.
It is quite simple. It is a matter of “acceptance,” versus “acceptance.”
There are primarily two ways of acceptance:
- You become ostracized by those within the stringent ethical perspective and gain “acceptance” from others.
- There is no ostracization, a conservative is accepting of sin and you develop a more “moderate” group.
Relative to Reactive & Responsive within the aforementioned enumeration the first is “reactive,” the second being “responsive.”